DNA AT ARREST PROTECTS & SAVES LIVES!
MAKE SB618 OKLAHOMA’S DNA AT ARREST LAW
DECIDE FROM FACTS, NOT FALSE FEARS.
DNA IS PRIMARILY NEEDED TO SOLVE VIOLENT CRIMES, OF WHICH
90% OF VICTIMS ARE WOMEN, 9% CHILDREN!
IN 2012, AFTER BEING ARRESTED IN COLORADO, ROBERT BRUCE’S DNA, MATCHED TO DNA FOUND AT 19 VICTIMS’ CRIME SCENES IN CLEVELAND COUNTY, OK AND 6 IN EDMOND (CRIMES FROM 1986 TO 2006)
BRITTANY PHILLIPS, MY BEAUTIFUL DAUGHTER,
MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN MURDERED (A PREVENTABLE CRIME)
IF OKLAHOMA TOOK DNA AT ARREST DURING HER LIFE!
10-4-85
TO
10-4-04
2000 SUSPECTS
' DNA HAVE BEEN COMPARED TO
HER KILLER’S DNA
LEFT AT CRIME SCENE!
NONE HAVE MATCHED!
***PREVENTABLES CRIMES-A VIOLENT OFFENDER IS ARRESTED NUMEROUS TIMES, FOR MINOR CRIMES BUT BECAUSE DNA IS NOT TAKEN AT ARREST, NEVER HAS THEIR DNA COMPARED TO UNSOLVED/COLD CASES
UNTIL AND ONLY IF THE PERSON GETS CONVICTED,
USUALLY AFTER 10-20 YEARS OF DOING CRIMES***.
THIS IS SHOWS WHAT IS SENT TO CODIS
NUMBERS, NOT THE PHYSICAL DNA SAMPLE
Lab XYZ (these letters represent the state lab’s code)
0012152 (this is a Code for the case number-NAME OF THE PERSON IS NOT SENT
06,09,11,12,10,10,22,24,9.3,10,08,09 These 2 lines are the codes representing the 14
14,14,15,17,17,22,25,12,12,9,10,09,13 pieces analyzed
(from the thousands a person has)
kzzz- (This code represents the specific analyst who did the work)
These “profiles” (not the sample) are uploaded to CODIS, our national DNA database.
***COURTS CAN’T CONVICT BY ONLY DNA—DNA IS AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL-OTHER STRONG, ADDITIVE EVIDENCE MUST PROVE GUILT***
******DNA AT ARREST LESSENS NUMBER OF REPEAT OFFENDERS BY IDENTIFYING CRIMINALS EARLY IN THEIR CAREERS!
***DNA AT ARREST LOWERS NUMBER OF COLD/UNSOLVED CRIMES, AS A SUSPECT’S DNA SAMPLE IS TAKEN AND MATCHES TO DNA FROM A CRIME SCENE BECAUSE RAPIST, OTHER VIOLENT OFFENDERS OFTEN GET ARRESTED FOR 10-20 YEARS BEFORE CONVICTION.
******DNA AT ARREST LOWERS POLICE COSTS BY FEWER HOURS ON CASES.
26 STATES HAVE PASSED DNA AT ARREST LAWS
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont
***MANY COURTS RULED DNA IS NO DIFFFERENT THAN FINGERPRINTS***
1) The purpose is akin to that of a fingerprint". State v. Raines 857 A.2d 19, 33 (Md. 2004) FOR
Anderson v. Com, Virginia Supreme Court, No. 062051, 9/14/07, FOR
2) US v. Mitchell, US Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit, No. 09-4718, July 25, 2011, FOR
3) Haskell v. Brown,US District Court for Northern District of California,12/23/09, FOR
4)U.S. v. Thomas, US District Court of Western District of New York, 2/14/11, FOR
5)People v. Buza, California Court of Appeals, First District, A125542, 8/4/11,
FOR
MORE CASES ON MITCH MORRISEY, DENVER’S DA’S WEBSITE, LISTED BELOW
***IF YOU WANT TO MAKE AN EDUCATED DECISION-READ THESE***
http://www.dfs.virginia.gov/statistics/index.cfm 8399 HITS SINCE 1998
http://www.goccp.maryland.gov/dna/statistics.php
www.sccvc.org/.../Chicagos_Study_on_Preventable_Crimes03-04-2008.pdf(chicago)
INFORMATIVE WEBSITES
www.brittanyphillipsmurder.net
CONTACT: BRITTANY’S MOTHER Dr. Maggie Zingman
9186292317 therapoet@aol.comtherapoet@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave thoughts! Or email me at therapoet@aol.com