DNA AT ARREST--FACTS, NOT MYTHS OPPONENTS USE WITHOUT FACTS

BEFORE MAKING A DECISION
 FOR OR AGAINST DNA AT ARREST,

 LEARN WHY IT IS NEEDED, WHAT IS MOST OFTEN USED FOR
HOW IT IS DESIGNED AND HOW IT PROTECTS PEOPLE AND SAVES LIVES.

THOSE OPPOSING DNA AT ARREST,
(BIG NATIONAL GROUPS LIKE ACLU)
      HURT MINORITIES BECAUSE  DNA AT ARREST PROTECTS AGAINST FALSE ARREST!!!
THOSE OPPOSING
HURT THE SAFETY OF INNOCENT PEOPLE BECAUSE DNA AT ARREST WOULD GET
VIOLENT PREDATORS  OFF THE STREETS IN EARLY YEARS NOT 20 YEARS LATER  AT CONVICTION
THOSE OPPOSING
REFUSE TO DEBATE, HAVING FEW FACTS TO  BACK THEIR FEAR MAKING STATEMENTS
THOSE OPPOSING
HELP CRIMINALSTO REMAIN FREE WHILE VICTIMS BECOME MORE IMPRISONED BY FEAR
 

IF YOU CARE ABOUT LOVED ONES, ABOUT OKLAHOMANS, READ ALL OF THIS!

   

                                     DNA AT ARREST PROTECTS & SAVES LIVES!

DNA AT ARREST STOPS THE INVASION OF PRIVACY

OF THE VICTIMS OF REPEAT OFFENDERS

MAKE SB618 OKLAHOMA’S DNA AT ARREST LAW

                                    
                                    DID YOU KNOW 

DNA IS PRIMARILY NEEDED TO SOLVE VIOLENT CRIMES, OF WHICH

 90% OF VICTIMS ARE WOMEN, 9% CHILDREN!

 

IN 2012, AFTER BEING ARRESTED IN COLORADO, ROBERT BRUCE’S DNA, MATCHED TO DNA FOUND AT 19 VICTIMS’ CRIME SCENES IN CLEVELAND COUNTY, OK AND 6 IN EDMOND (CRIMES FROM 1986 TO 2006)

 

 

BRITTANY PHILLIPS, MY BEAUTIFUL DAUGHTER,

MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN MURDERED (A PREVENTABLE CRIME)

IF OKLAHOMA TOOK DNA AT ARREST DURING HER LIFE!

10-4-85 TO 10-4-04

2000 SUSPECTS ' DNA HAVE BEEN COMPARED TO KILLER’S DNA WITH NO MATCH 

 

***PREVENTABLES CRIMES-A VIOLENT OFFENDER IS ARRESTED NUMEROUS TIMES, FOR MINOR CRIMES IS NEVER CONNECTED TO COLD CASES

BUT BECAUSE DNA IS NOT TAKEN AT THEIR ARREST,

UNTIL AND ONLY IF THE PERSON GETS CONVICTED,

***(OFTEN AFTER 10-20 YEARS OF DOING CRIMES***.

THIS IS SHOWS WHAT IS SENT TO CODIS---CODED NUMBERS,
 NO PHYSICAL DNA IS SENT TO THE DATABASE---JUST NUMBERS

Lab XYZ (these letters represent the state lab’s code)

0012152 (this is a Code for the case number-NAME OF THE PERSON IS NOT SENT 06,09,11,12,10,10,22,24,9.3,10,08,09 These 2 lines are the codes representing the 14

14,14,15,17,17,22,25,12,12,9,10,09,13 pieces analyzed (from the thousands a person has)

kzzz- (This code represents the specific analyst who did the work)

These “profiles” (not the sample) are uploaded to CODIS, our national DNA database.

***COURTS CAN’T CONVICT BY ONLY DNA—DNA IS AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL-OTHER STRONG, ADDITIVE EVIDENCE MUST PROVE GUILT***

 

******DNA AT ARREST LESSENS NUMBER OF REPEAT OFFENDERS BY IDENTIFYING CRIMINALS EARLY IN THEIR CAREERS! ***DNA AT ARREST LOWERS NUMBER OF COLD/UNSOLVED CRIMES, AS A SUSPECT’S DNA SAMPLE IS TAKEN AND MATCHES TO DNA FROM A CRIME SCENE BECAUSE RAPIST, OTHER VIOLENT OFFENDERS OFTEN GET ARRESTED FOR 10-20 YEARS BEFORE CONVICTION.

******DNA AT ARREST LOWERS POLICE COSTS BY FEWER HOURS ON CASES.

26 STATES HAVE PASSED DNA AT ARREST LAWS Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont

 

***MANY COURTS RULED DNA IS NO DIFFFERENT THAN FINGERPRINTS***

1) The purpose is akin to that of a fingerprint". State v. Raines 857 A.2d 19, 33 (Md. 2004) FOR Anderson v. Com, Virginia Supreme Court, No. 062051, 9/14/07, FOR

2) US v. Mitchell, US Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit, No. 09-4718, July 25, 2011, FOR

3) Haskell v. Brown,US District Court for Northern District of California,12/23/09, FOR

4)U.S. v. Thomas, US District Court of Western District of New York, 2/14/11, FOR

5)People v. Buza, California Court of Appeals, First District, A125542, 8/4/11,

FOR MORE CASES ON MITCH MORRISEY, DENVER’S DA’S WEBSITE, LISTED BELOW

 

***IF YOU WANT TO MAKE AN EDUCATED DECISION-READ THESE*** http://www.dfs.virginia.gov/statistics/index.cfm 8399 HITS SINCE 1998 http://www.goccp.maryland.gov/dna/statistics.php www.sccvc.org/.../Chicagos_Study_on_Preventable_Crimes03-04-2008.pdf(chicago)  

INFORMATIVE WEBSITES

www.DNAsaves.org  www.denverda.org/DNA/DNA_INDEX.htm    www.brittanyphillipsmurder.net

CONTACT:   BRITTANY’S MOTHER Dr. Maggie Zingman  9186292317    therapoet@aol.com

 

PLEASE READ THESE ARTICLES. THEY ARE EASILY FOUND NON INTERNET

 

A). Chicago’s Study on Preventable Crimes - requiring DNA for Felony arrests can solve and prevent violent crimes. Waiting for conviction can cost lives, Study by the City of Chicago, 2005 Chicago Preventable Crimes-Final.pdf Arrestee law Chicago Study.wmv

B)Maryland Study on Preventable Crimes - Requiring DNA for qualifying arrests in the proposed legislation can solve and prevent violent crimes. Study by the Maryland Criminal Justice Information System, the Baltimore County Police Department and the Maryland State Police, 2008. MarylandDNAarresteestudy.pdf

C) Washington State Preventable Crime Study 2008. WA Preventable Crime.pdf

D). The FBI Rules for Arrestee and Detainee DNA Collection, Federal Register,
Vol. 73, No. 76, 4/18/08. the FBI final rule on arrestee and detainee
testing.pdf

E).Denver’s Study on Preventable Crimes - Requiring DNA for felony arrests can solve and prevent violent crimes. Waiting for conviction can cost lives and allows sexual predators to continue to rape victims, Study by the Denver District Attorney’s Office 2009. Denver's Preventable Crimes Study.pdf

F)Why Arrestee DNA Legislation Can Save Indianan Taxpayers Over $50 Million
Per Year, Siegel and Narveson, January 2009. Indiana Arrestee Legislation - Jan 13 2009.pdf

G) The Constitutionality of DNA Sampling on Arrest, DH Kaye 2000,

http://homepages.law.asu.edu/~kayed/pubs/genlaw/01-CJLPP-arrest.htm