FOR OR AGAINST DNA AT ARREST,
HOW IT IS DESIGNED AND HOW IT PROTECTS PEOPLE AND SAVES LIVES.
The Maryland v. King decision was released; the Supreme Court overturn the Mar Mariposayland Court of Appeals; ******holding that DNA collection from Arrestees WAS!!! IS!!! constitutional.****** THESE ARE THREE EXAMPLES EMAIL ME AT THERAPOET@AOL.COM FOR THE COMPLETE STUDIES FROM CHICAGO, MARYLAND, INDIANA AND DENVER Requiring DNA for felony arrests (at arrest) does solve and prevent violent crimes. Waiting for conviction costs lives. Study by the City of Chicago, and presented to the State Legislature in 2005 ****************Chicago’s Study on Preventable Crimes******* This study show how !!!60 violent crimes could have been prevented, including 53 murders and rapes!!!! if these 8 men had had DNA taken at one of their arrests Most states require DNA collection upon felony conviction, but review of criminal records shows offenders often have**numerous felony arrests before conviction** CHICAGO IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE. I WILL SEND YOU MORE. Chicago’s examination of criminal activities of*** eight individuals identified 60 violent crimes, that, if DNA had been taken at arrest--“the fingerprint of the 21st century” could have been prevented. In each case, the offender committed previously ***undetected violent crimes**** that ***would have been solved through a DNA match***. But DNA was not required at arrest. INSTEAD… • 22 murders – victims ranging from 24 to 44 years of age • 30 rapes – victims ranging from 15 to 65 years of age • Attempted rapes • Aggravated kidnapping The 8 men with almost ALL FEMALE VICTIMS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE accumulated a total of 21 felony arrests before finally being identified. Only seven of the prior felony arrests were for violent crimes – the remaining two-thirds of arrests were for non-violent felonies. They were free to commit--60 violent crimes, including 53 murders and rapes, that could have been prevented. Chicago Preventable Crimes. (BELOW ARE JUST TWO OF THE 8 EXAMPLES FROM CHICAGO STUDY. THERE ARE VIRGIANIA, INDIANA AND DENVER STUDIES Andre Crawford was charged with eleven murders and one attempted murder/aggravated sexual assault. If the state had required him to give a DNA sample during his felony arrest on March 6, 1993, a DNA match could have been obtained with the DNA evidence recovered from his first murder. Ten murders could have been prevented. If Crawford’s DNA had been taken on March 6, 1993 after he was arrested for attempted sexual abuse (felony),the subsequent 10 murders and one rape would not have happened. 03/1993 He was arrested for felony theft NO DNA taken 09/1993 1st murder, DNA evidence recovered from crime scene-no identification of perpetrator 12/1994 - 04/1995 2 women murdered 05/1995-- 07/1997 arrested for Felony attempted sexual abuse 1 victim// Women murdered// woman raped 1997-1999 7 women murdered 01/1998 Arrested for felony drug possession***** ____________________________ Brandon Harris was convicted of five aggravated criminal sexual assaults and one aggravated kidnapping/attempted rape.If the state had required him to give a DNA sample during his felony arrest on August 25, 2000, a DNA match could have been obtained with the DNA evidence recovered from his first rape. Four rapes and one attempted rape/armed robbery/aggravated kidnapping could have been prevented. 12/1999 1st rape, DNA evidence recovered 08/2000 - 10/2000 Arrest for sexual assault 11/2000 1 woman raped, 1 woman kidnapped 12/2000 Arrest for robbery, while home confined, another rape occurs 02/2001 1 women raped,1 girl raped 05/2001 Girl raped ____________________________________________ Geoffrey Griffin was charged with eight murders and one aggravated criminal sexual assault. If the state had required him to give a DNA sample during his felony arrest on August 26, 1995, a DNA match could have been obtained with the DNA evidence recovered from his first rape. Eight murders, one rape and one attempted rape could have been prevented. If Griffin’s DNA had been taken on August 26, 1995 after he was arrested for possession of a controlled substance (felony), the subsequent eight murders, one rape and one attempted rape would not have happened. 08/1995 Arrest for drug possession 07/1998 Woman raped & killed, DNA evidence recovered 07/1998 - 05/2000 4 women murdered, 1 woman raped 06/2000 Woman attacked 06/2000 4 women murdered 06/2000 Arrested & charged with 8 murders, 1 sexual assault ___________________________________ THESE ARE THREE EXAMPLES EMAIL ME AT THERAPOET@AOL.COM FOR THE COMPLETE STUDIES FROM CHICAGO, MARYLAND, INDIANA AND DENVER THIS IS NOT OKAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE SHARE http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-upholds-maryland-law-says-police-may-take-dna-samples-from-arrestees/2013/06/03/0b619ade-cc5a-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.
THOSE OPPOSING DNA AT ARREST,
(BIG NATIONAL GROUPS LIKE ACLU)
HURT MINORITIES BECAUSE DNA AT ARREST PROTECTS AGAINST FALSE ARREST!!!
HURT THE SAFETY OF INNOCENT PEOPLE BECAUSE DNA AT ARREST WOULD GET
VIOLENT PREDATORS OFF THE STREETS IN EARLY YEARS NOT 20 YEARS LATER AT CONVICTION
REFUSE TO DEBATE, HAVING FEW FACTS TO BACK THEIR FEAR MAKING STATEMENTS
HELP CRIMINALSTO REMAIN FREE WHILE VICTIMS BECOME MORE IMPRISONED BY FEAR
IF YOU CARE ABOUT LOVED ONES, ABOUT OKLAHOMANS, READ ALL OF THIS!
C) Washington State Preventable Crime Study 2008. WA Preventable Crime.pdf
D). The FBI Rules for Arrestee and Detainee DNA Collection, Federal Register,
Vol. 73, No. 76, 4/18/08. the FBI final rule on arrestee and detainee
E).Denver’s Study on Preventable Crimes - Requiring DNA for felony arrests can solve and prevent violent crimes. Waiting for conviction can cost lives and allows sexual predators to continue to rape victims, Study by the Denver District Attorney’s Office 2009. Denver's Preventable Crimes Study.pdf
F)Why Arrestee DNA Legislation Can Save Indianan Taxpayers Over $50 Million
Per Year, Siegel and Narveson, January 2009. Indiana Arrestee Legislation - Jan 13 2009.pdf
G) The Constitutionality of DNA Sampling on Arrest, DH Kaye 2000,